home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Path: netcom.com!bnelson
- From: bnelson@netcom.com (Bob Nelson)
- Subject: Re: POSIX/Unix conformance (was: ANSI C and POSIX ...)
- Message-ID: <bnelsonDpKtG1.B6w@netcom.com>
- Followup-To: comp.lang.c
- Organization: a computer running Linux
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
- References: <JSA.96Feb16135027@organon.com> <dewar.828912460@schonberg> <4kb1l1$ajm@solutions.solon.com> <dewar.828987795@schonberg> <4kcf2q$mll@solutions.solon.com> <emery-0804961940190001@line297.nwm.mindlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 03:52:49 GMT
- Sender: bnelson@netcom21.netcom.com
-
- On Mon, 08 Apr 1996 19:40:16 +0100, David Emery wrote:
- >> There are actually two separate issues that no one has adequately
- >> addressed:
- >> 1. POSIX conformance
- >> 2. Unix(tm) conformance
- >> Let me try to summarize POSIX conformance...
- [...line after line mercifully deleted...]
-
- ...and how might any of this be of value to a newsgroup devoted strictly
- to the topic of Standard C?
-
- --
- =============================================================================
- Bob Nelson: Dallas, Texas, U.S.A. - bnelson@netcom.com
- Linux for fun, M$ for $$$...and the NFL for what really counts!
- =============================================================================
-
-